Crisis Should Make U.S. Do Some Soul-Searching

    In an interview with the Financial Times on the eve of the end of his term, the former U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson claimed the global financial crisis was partly caused by the high deposit ratio in emerging economies including China. He said such a financial policy had contributed to an aggravating imbalance in the global economy and emboldened U.S. investors to buy high-risk properties.

    It is completely a ridiculous conclusion both in time order and in causal relationship.

    It is known that the U.S. has suffered a deposit shortage for a long time. The individual deposit ratio in the world's largest economy once reached a decades-high 8.2 percent in 1982 under the Reagan administration's high interest rate policy to spur economic growth.

    But the figure has since declined and remained at zero from the 1990s till now. Compared with their U.S. counterparts who have long got accustomed to overspending, Chinese people have developed a tradition of savings since ancient times. Due to the growth of their incomes after the country's adoption of the reform and opening-up policy, bank deposits began to increase in China.

    But for a long period, the country's high savings failed to push its foreign reserves to rapidly increase. On the contrary, the nation had long suffered a foreign reserve insufficiency until recent years.

    China's foreign reserve growth has been mainly pushed by its trade surplus and investment from other countries, including that from the U.S.. Due to its ever-increasing economic openness to the outside world, China has been considered by foreign enterprises as an ideal investment haven. As a result, the export by China-based foreign enterprises takes the lion's share of the country's total export volumes.

    With the redundant foreign reserves in hand, mostly dollar-valued, what China should first do is to merge some foreign enterprises or to purchase desperately needed high-tech products from other countries. But both ran into a wall in the U.S. under Washington's excuse of national security.

    Without any better options to invest its enormous foreign reserves China had to turn to buying U.S. treasury bonds. However, such investment has brought China almost a zero return as the Federal Reserves continuously lowered interests rates for the sake of economic stimulation.

    There is no doubt that the large-scale inflow of foreign capital has offered important funds for China's economic development at certain times.

    China's foreign reserve investment has also provided the U.S. economy with similarly needed fund resources. However, due to its defective financial monitoring mechanisms, the enormous amount of fund from China proved to have been misused.

    This is the responsibility the U.S. administration should undertake. Regrettably, the U.S. authorities did their utmost to shirk their own responsibilities instead of conducting some soul-searching into the country's problematic financial policies and instruments. This is a long-used practice by Washington in its dealings with other countries.

    With the continuous dollar devaluation since 1972 when the Nixon administration decided not to peg the dollar to gold against opposition from its allies on the other side of the Atlantic, the wealth of these Western nations suffered a drastic shrinkage.

    The similar practice was repeated by the U.S. in the 1990s. To transfer part of its excess productivity, the world's largest economy began to move some unnecessary manufacturing and trade sectors to some Asian nations.

    After the 1997 Asian financial crisis, some emerging Asian economies, including China, began to reinforce their foreign reserves and domestic bank deposit. This is a valuable lesson Asian nations learned from the 1997 crisis to beef up their capability to deal with a possible crisis.

    In the Asian financial crisis, the U.S. dominated International Monetary Fund's (IMF) economic aid plans to crisis-struck Asian nations. As a precondition for assistance, the U.S.-led international body prescribed medicine for Asian nations, demanding them to adopt a tightened fiscal policy and raise interest rates. Also, they were urged to reduce financial deficits and increase international reserves.

    The increased international and domestic savings by Asian nations after the 1997 crisis greatly helped raise their ability to fend off a financial crisis. However, some U.S. politicians now blame such a strategy for the latest financial crisis.

    By doing so, politicians in Washington are clearly taking an unwise step. Having been plunged deep into the economic crisis, the credit-starved U.S. now badly needs foreign funds to aid its ailing economy and stock market. However, due to the contracting demand in European and American markets, Asian countries too have suffered a decline both in export and foreign reserves. This would dent their ability for capital export to the U.S..

    Washington's policy of eluding responsibility would extremely dampen Asian nations' enthusiasm to continue to buy U.S. national debt.

    (Source: China Daily)